All Union Communist Party of Bolsheviks
Stalin in the Distorted Mirror of History Falsifiers
At the present time, anti-communism is losing its priority place in the
ideology of bourgeois reformism, because today, the people of Russia can clearly
compare "how it was in the communist time and how it is in Yeltsin's time."
Another thing is that the Stalin epoch is separated by over forty years from the
present time. Therefore, they instantly bring forth anti-Stalinism which is an
extremely dangerous form of anti-communism.
It is important to keep in mind that many Communists perceived "as the truth"
the so-called revelations of Khrushchev, made at the XX Congress of the CPSU.
The bourgeois counter-revolution used them with all their might. The lie of the
"Khrushchev Thaw" was fully used by the opportunists of a number of communist
parties in the world. In this connection, we greet the publication of a book by
Ludo Martens "Another view about Stalin" which deals a telling blow to
It is known that scientists are appraised by their discoveries, artists by
their paintings, writers by their works. So the politicians should be appraised
by the results of their rule. The rule of Stalin's activities are enormous.
Winston Churchill said: "Stalin came to Russia with a wooden plough and left it
in possession of atomic weapons."
Such results are not accidental. Stalin possessed the most important
qualities of a political leader. He correctly estimated the future. He correctly
promoted aims and formulated tasks. What is more -- he proposed the best ways to
go in achieving these tasks. He possessed a strong political will-power which
helped to achieve the set aims. Stalin had a very bright personality, a great
dialectical mind, many-sided knowledge, colossal efficiency and outstanding
organizational abilities. He was a keen diplomat. In his daily life, he was very
modest, a man without any greed or desire for riches. There is uncounted
evidence of it all.
Stalin earned colossal authority in the International Revolutionary Movement
as well as in the Communist Movement, and like Lenin, he earned great respect
and love of the toiling masses. This people's love converted into a great
material force which helped the Soviet people to surmount trials, made by the
capitalist environment, into the first Socialist State. Today, the bourgeois
reformers ridicule in a ruffian manner the people's love and esteem of the
Stalin heroic generation of builders and defenders of socialism.
N.S. Khrushchev lost to a great extent his authority because he was
eradicating not the "personality cult," but people's love of Stalin. Why was the
name of Stalingrad changed to Volgograd? Why did they secretly, in a manner of
thieves, remove Stalin from his place in the Mausoleum? Would it not have been
sufficient to apportion a separate wall in the Mausoleum for Stalin's
sarcophagus in order to allow all those who wished to do so to come and visit
it? Then it would not have been necessary to place in it next leaders of the
Theirs is not the same scale of activities and not the same results as that
of Lenin and Stalin. After all, none of them earned the love of the people!
People's love cannot be earned in an empty place. People may sympathize with
advances and promises, but not forever. As a result, Khrushchev became the
object of laughs, Brezhnev of mockery, Gorbachev of scorn, and Yeltsin of
Why do the ideologists of the bourgeoisie and renegades hate and fear Stalin
now? Why is it that in the USSR since Khrushchev's time, they keep on destroying
Stalin's writings and the literature about him with such frenzy? Possibly
because Stalin's logic is able even now to charm and fascinate unprejudiced
readers and investigators, to help them to separate the super-qualified steel of
Leninism from the rusty scrap of opportunism, revisionism and other
petty-bourgeois works, contained today in the arms of counter-revolution.
You know, the enemies of Stalin are fighting not with his epoch as a
realistic past of the country, but with a completely false sick fiction. There
is no truthful search for facts, but a manipulated avalanche of lies and
ignorance. For instance, they write that the country paid dearly for the
achievements of Stalin. As if Stalin in that period could have chosen the
correct path or a wrong path of development! Between bad and worse roads? More
often, the situation internally and externally forced the Soviet government to
choose between bad roads and extremely dangerous roads. Many problems cropped up
that demanded immediate actions according to the sources available at that
moment. Therefore, they had to do with whatever was available and possible
(keeping in mind that the USSR was surrounded by enemies). It is a fact that the
road chosen at that time by the Soviet government headed by Stalin was the path
that was optimal. Soviet Union went through the path in a few years that took
other developed countries one hundred years.
Another attack was that under Stalin, people lived very poorly. We lived at
that time according to the means and possibility under the prevailing
conditions. The period of "self reliance" was from 1920 to 1950. USSR did not
receive any help from anyone. But our economy was not in a crisis as it is now
in 1941. With every year, our lives were improving. We were happier and more
satisfied with every passing year.
Of course, the development of life and economy is not without problems. There
were still classes, and the development had to be looked upon as to which class
should be served, the majority or the minority... cooperatives or private
enterprisers? The people were gaining higher understanding, moral fortitude and
unity in constructing socialism and these are the people that stopped the Hitler
tanks and hordes when they invaded our Motherland.
The Great Patriotic War gave credence to Stalin's leadership and policy. He
became the focal point as the leader and war tactician of the highest order. As
Commander-in-Chief, his role in the war was beyond reproach by anyone, including
the foreign enemies who had nothing but praise for Stalin's leadership during
the war. Today however, the so-called "war experts" have "liberated the General
Command of the Red Army" from the history of the Great Patriotic War.
Paradoxically, after the victory of the Soviet people in 1941-1945 years,
according to the anti-communists, the victory was achieved in SPITE of Stalin!
What were the true facts?
Khrushchev at the 20th Congress of the CPSU emphatically said that Stalin
fought the "war globally and not on the front"! Stupidity of this utterance
immediately brought denials, demands of apology by the living Generals, Marshals
and front-line fighters during the Great Patriotic War. Nevertheless, this
Khrushchev version up to this day prevails, supported by scores of "historians,"
all of them writing volumes upon volumes of lies and not having any trouble
financing their books, etc., etc.
The biggest lie is that Stalin did not know when the war started, got
panicky, locked himself up at the dacha outside of Moscow, was getting
senselessly drunk for one week, taking himself away from every facet of
governing, etc., etc., ad nauseam.
In reality, everything was much different.
JUNE 22, 1941 -- Politbureau and Stalin at its head worked on the text of the
speech to the Soviet people, which was delivered by Molotov, giving directives,
commands on mobilization of other civilians to the ranks of Red Army, announcing
the appointment of Marshals and Generals of different fronts, etc.
JUNE 23, 1941 -- General Central Command was established.
JUNE 24, 1941 -- Emergency meeting of the leaders of Industry to plan the war
output. Held in the cabinet of Marshal Stalin.
JUNE 25, 1941 -- Reserve Army was formed under the command of Marshal
JUNE 27, 1941 -- Decision of the CC All Union Communist Party of Bolsheviks
to mobilize Communists and Komsomol members.
JUNE 29, 1941 -- Directives of the CC AUCPB to broadcast the speech of Stalin
on July 3, 1941. After that, the meeting of the Politbureau with the General
Command of the Red Army.
JUNE 30, 1941 -- Establishment of the State Defense Committee with Stalin as
Documents of these days give the lie to the vicious lies of Khrushchev.
The most prevalent lies about Stalin is that in 1937-1938 years, the army was
decimated with purges and that Stalin purged and killed 300,000 commanders and
political commissars. These falsehoods and lies should look at the known facts,
that the Red Army had only 140,000 commanders and political commissars in total.
In the magazine "Young Guard" (1989 -- #9) there was published a document
taken from the archives of the Ministry of Defense of the USSR, which was
presented at that time to Stalin, Molotov, Voroshilov and Beria on May 5, 1940,
that in 1937-1939, 36,898 commanders were dismissed from the ranks of Red Army.
More than 75% of them were retired because of their age, sickness, moral grounds
(drunkenness) and unworthy of service in the Red Army. From August of 1938,
there was working a commission which was told to look into these cases and make
recommendations. More than 30,000 requests were received by those dismissed to
look into their appeals. In January 1, 1940, this commission returned to their
posts more than 12,461 commanders, from those 10,700 were formerly dismissed for
political reasons and now put back into ranks.
Do not forget that there were hidden enemies of the Red Army inside the CC
CPSU and did their dirty work.
In the above listing of numbers in the Red Army, let us not forget that there
were thousands of former Tsarist officers, who were accepted into the Red Army
by Trotsky, in whose ranks were Tukhachevsky, Yakir, Uborevich and others. Most
of them harbored their lost class interests and were hidden enemies of
socialism, although there were hundreds who became loyal Army Officers in the
Red Army and fought valiantly against the Hitler Hordes.
The main conspirator of these anti-state officers was Trotsky who was
expelled in 1929 but still kept in touch and led the hidden officers in the Red
Army. Let us not ignore the fact that foreign secret services were also in touch
with these officers and manipulated them for their own ends.
Many so-called "historians" to this day say that in the middle of 1930s,
there was no Officers Corps left in the USSR. Let us examine this falsehood
again. How serious are these charges and how are they built on facts? They say
that it was a planned uprising against the political leadership of Marshal
Voroshilov. If this was the case, in any civilized country, this action is
called a PUTSCH. In the Soviet Union, they would call this attempt an
anti-Soviet pro-Trotsky agreement. This Putsch was found out and brought into
the open and this was just before the outbreak of the Great Patriotic War. This
attempt was tragic and in any tragedy, there are some innocent people that
suffer, because the guilty enemies try to implicate innocent patriots,
communists who had nothing to do with this attempt. Every serious student of
history knows this to be a fact -- examples in the historical context are many.
The blame must be shared by the counter-revolutionaries and some enemies that
were inside the NKVD.
In the "War and Historical Magazine" (1991 -- #9) there is a photocopy of the
statement by Tukhachevsky who was in charge of Internal Security of USSR. The
Marshal states that he was arrested May 22, 1937, taken to Moscow on May 24 and
was interrogated on May 25th. In his statement of May 26th, he says that he
agrees with his sentence as was handed down by the Tribunal. He then proceeded
to give facts, names of the conspirators, their actions, and gives documents.
All this was handwritten in his own hand. He said that he was not forced to do
this confession. The Captain who was interrogating him in no way would have been
able to know the facts, the details and the personnel. It showed that
Tukhachevsky, after his arrest, was demoralized by actual facts and decided to
give the details himself and confess that he was guilty. The other conspirators
also confessed since the proof was irrefutable.
Of course, there were mistakes in the General Command and Stalin... in what
High Command of the Allies were there not -- they readily admit this, but of
course, the press does not condemn them or dwell of their human errors.
President Roosevelt of the USA publicly admitted that one third of his decisions
were wrong. Roosevelt said that America should have stepped in quicker to help
the USSR and not wait for Japan to attack Pearl Harbor.
Stalin was never worried about his prestige. Whenever he made a mistake, he
always said so and tried to correct it. As an example, during the Plenum of CC
AUCPB in 1938, he admitted being rude and uncivil to some party people and
non-party personnel. This was published in all of the newspapers in the USSR.
There were people that were rehabilitated and received apologies personally from
Stalin. You must remember again, that Stalin DID NOT know everyone that was
sentenced, he based himself on people like Beria for information and
documentation. Knowing the history as was given above, you can draw your own
conclusion as to the complexity of those years.
in 1939 at the XVIII party congress, again the question was brought up of
repressions. The Congress decided to eliminate the previous leadership of the
organs and started cleansing the party of unhealthy and enemy elements within
The mistake was that the AUCPB was not regularly cleansing itself of
opportunists and that did harm to its operations.
V.I. Lenin was very truthful when he said that the governing party must
always cleanse itself from "false skins" and "opportunists-lap lickers".