The Organization of the International (1869)
The masses are the social power, or, at least, the essence
of that power. But they lack two things in order to free themselves
from the hateful conditions which oppress them: education, and
organization. These two things represent: today, the real foundations
of power of all government.
To abolish the military and governing power of the State, the
proletariat must organize. But since organization cannot exist
without knowledge, it is necessary to spread among the masses
real social education.
To spread this real social education is the aim of the International.
Consequently, the day on which the international succeeds in uniting
in its ranks a half, a fourth, or even a tenth part of the workers
of Europe, the State or States will cease to exist. The organization
of the International will be altogether different from the organization
of the State, since its aim is not to create new States but to
destroy all existing government systems. The more artificial,
brutal, and authoritarian is the power of the State, the more
indifferent and hostile it is to the natural developments, interests
and desires of the people, the freer and more natural must be
the organization of the International. It must try all the more
to accommodate itself to the natural instincts and ideals of the
But what do we mean by the natural organization of the masses?
We mean the organization which is founded upon the experience
and results of their everyday life and the difference of their
occupations, i.e., their industrial organization. The moment all
branches of industry are represented in their International, the
organization of the masses will be complete.
But it might be said that, since we exist, the International,
organized influence over the masses: we are aiming at new power
equally with the politicians of the old State systems. This change
is a great mistake. The influences of the International over the
masses differs from all government power in that, it is no more
than a natural, unofficial influence of ordinary ideas, without
The State is the authority, the rule, and organized power of
the possessing class, and the make-believe experts over the life
and liberty of masses. The State does not want anything other
than the servility of the masses. At once it demands their submission.
The International, on the other hand, has no other object then
the absolute freedom of the masses. Consequently, it appeals to
the rebel instinct. In order that this rebel instinct should be
strong and powerful enough to overthrow the rule of the State
and the privileged class, the International must organize.
To realize this goal, it has to employ two quite just weapons:
1. The propagation of its ideas.
2. The natural organization of its power or authority, through
the influence of its adherents on the masses.
A person who can assert that, organized activity is an attack
on tine freedom of the masses, or an attempt to create a new rule,
is either a sophist or a fool. It is sad enough for these who
don't know the rules of human solidarity, to think that complete
individual independence is possible, or desirable. Such a condition
would mean the dissolution of all human society, since the entire
social existence of man depends on the interdependence of individuals
and the masses. Every person, even the cleverest and strongest-nay,
especially the clever and strong--are at all times, the creatures
as also the creators of this influence. The freedom of each individual
is the direct outcome of these material mental and moral influences,
of all individuals surrounding him in that society in which he
lives, develops, and dies. A person who seeks to free himself
from that influence in the name of a metaphysical, superhuman,
and perfectly egotistical "freedom" aims at his own
extermination as a human being. And these who refuse to use that
influence on others, withdraw from all activity of social life,
and by not passing on their thoughts and feelings, work for their
own destruction. Therefore, this so-called "independence,"
which is preached so often by the idealists and metaphysicians:
this so-called individual liberty is only the destruction of existence.
In nature, as well as in human society, which is never anything
else than part of that same nature, every creature exists on condition
that he tries, as much as his individuality will permit, to influence
the lives of others. The destruction of that indirect influence
would mean death. And when we desire the freedom of the masses,
we by no means want to destroy this natural influence, which individuals
or groups of individuals, create through their own contract.
What we seek is the abolition of the artificial, privileged,
lawful, and official influence. If the Church and State wore private
institutions, we should be, even then, I suppose their opponents.
We should not have protested against their right to exist. True,
in a sense, they are, today, private institutions, as they exit
exclusively to conserve the interests of the privileged classes.
Still, we oppose them, because they use all the power of the masses
to force their rule upon the latter in an authoritarian, official,
and brutal manner. If the International could have organized itself
in the State manner, we, its most enthusiastic friends, would
have become its bitterest enemies. But it cannot possibly organize
itself in such a form. The International cannot recognize limits
to human fellowship and, whilst the State cannot exist unless
it limits, by territorial pretensions, such fellowship and equality,
History has shown us that the realization of a league of all the
States of the world, about which all the despots have dreamt,
is impossible. Hence these who speak of the State, necessarily
think and speak of a world divided into different States, who
are internally oppressors and outwardly despoilers, i.e., enemies
to each other. The State, since it involves this division, oppression,
and despoliation of humanity, must represent the negation of humanity
and the destruction of human society.
There would not have been any sense in the organization of
the workers at al!, if they had not aimed at the overthrow of
the State. The International organizes the masses with this object
in view, to the end that they might recall this goal. And how
does it organize them?
Not from the top to the bottom, by imposing a seeming unity
and order on human society, as the state attempts, without regards
to the differences of interest arising from differences of occupation.
On the contrary, the International organizes the masses from the
bottom up wards, taking the social life of the masses, their real
aspirations as a starting point, and encouraging them to unite
in groups according to their real interests in society. The International
evolves a unity of purpose and creates a real equilibrium of aim
and well-being out of their natural difference in life and occupation.
Just because the International is organized in this way, it
develops a real power. Hence it is essential that every member
of every group should be acquainted thoroughly with all its principles.
Only by these means will he make a good propagandist in time of
peace and real revolutionist in time of war.
We all know that our program is just. It expresses in a few
noble words the just and humane demands of the proletariat. Just
because it is an absolutely humane program, it contains all the
symptoms of the social revolution. It proclaims the destruction
of the old and the creation of the new world.
This is the main point which we must explain to all members
of the International. This program substitutes a new science,
a new philosophy for the old religion. And it defines a new international
policy, in place of the old diplomacy. It has no other object
than the overthrow of the States.
In order that the members of the International scientifically
fill their posts, as revolutionary propagandists, it is necessary
for every one to be imbued with the new science, philosophy, and
policy: the new spirit of the International. It is not enough
to declare that we want the economic freedom of the workers, a
full return for our labor, the abolition of classes, the end of
political slavery, the realization of nil human rights, equal
duties and justice for all: in a phrase, the unity of humanity.
All this, is, without a doubt, very good and just. But when the
workers of the International simply go on repeating these phrases,
without grasping their truth and meaning. they have to face the
danger of reducing their just claims to empty words, cant which
is nothing without understanding.
It might be answered that not all workers, even when they are
members of the International, can be educated. It is not enough,
then, that there are in the organization, a group of people, who--as
far as possible--re acquainted with the science, philosophy, and
policy of Socialism? Cannot the wide mass follow their "brotherly
advice "not to turn from the right path, that leads ultimately
to the freedom of the proletariat?
The authoritarian Communists in the International often make
use of these arguments, although they have wanted the courage
to state them so freely and so clearly. They have sought to hide
their real opinion under demagogic compliments about the cleverness
and all powerfulness of the people. We were always the bitterest
enemies of this opinion. And we are convinced, that, if the International
split into two groups-a big majority, and small minority of ton,
twenty or more people-in such a way, that the majority were convinced
blindly of the theoretical and practical sense of the minority,
the result would be the reduction of the International to an oligarchy--the
worst form of State. The educated and capable minority would,
together with its responsibilities, demand the rights of a governing
body. And this governing body would prove more despotic than an
avowed autocracy, because it would be hidden beneath a show of
servile respect for the will of the people. The minority would
rule through the medium of resolutions, imposed upon the people,
and after. wards called "the will, of the people." In
this way, the educated minority would develop Into a government,
which, like all other governments, would grow every day more despotic
The International only then can become a weapon for liberating
the people, when it frees itself; when it does not permit itself
to be divided into two groups--a big majority, the blind tool
of an educated minority. That is why its first duty is to imprint
upon the minds of its members the science, philosophy, and policy
Next: The Workers and the Sphinx