Next: What should be
Up: `Dekulakization'
Previous: `Dekulakization'
Kulak authority was based to a great extent on the cultural backwardness,
illiteracy, superstition and medieval religious beliefs of the majority
of peasants. Hence, the kulak's most powerful weapon, also the most
difficult to confront, was rumor and indoctrination.
In 1928--1929, identical rumors were found throughout the Soviet
territory. In the kolkhoz, women and children would be collectivized.
In the kolkhoz, everyone would sleep under a single gigantic blanket.
The Bolshevik government would force women to cut their hair so that it
could be exported. The Bolsheviks would mark women on the forehead for
identification. They would Russify local populations.
.
Viola,
op. cit.
, p. 154.
All sorts of other terrifying `information' was heard. In
the kolkhozy, a special machine would burn the old so that they would
not eat any more wheat. Children would be taken away from their parents
and sent to crèches. Four thousand women would be sent to China to
pay for the Chinese Eastern Railway. The kolkhozians would be the first
ones sent in a war. Then a rumor announced that soon the White Armies
would return. Believers were told about the next coming of the
Anti-Christ and that the world would end in two years.
.
Viola,
op. cit.
, p. 154.
Davies,
op. cit.
, pp. 212--213.
In the Tambov okrug, the kulaks carefully mixed rumor and political
propaganda. They said that
`(S)etting up the kolkhozy is a kind of serf labour (barshchina) where the
peasant will again have to work under the rod ...; the Soviet
government should enrich the peasants first and then push through the
establishment of kolkhozy, and not do what it is doing now, which is to
try to make a rich farm out of ruined farms which have no grain.'
.
Davies,
op. cit.
, p. 221.
Here we see the budding alliance between the kulaks and
Bukharin:
the kulaks did not openly oppose Soviet power nor even the kolkhozy:
but, the peasants should first be allowed to enrich themselves, and we can
always see later about collectivization. Just as
Bukharin
spoke of the
`feudal exploitation of the peasantry', the kulaks denounced
`serfdom'.
Next: What should be
Up: `Dekulakization'
Previous: `Dekulakization'
Fri Aug 25 09:03:42 PDT 1995