Next: The kolkhozy surpass
Up: The first wave
Previous: The first wave
The bourgeoisie has always maintained that the Soviet collectivization
`destroyed the dynamic forces in the countryside' and caused a permanent
stagnation of agriculture. It describes the kulaks as individual `dynamic
and entrepeneurial' peasants. This is nothing but an ideological fable
destined to tarnish socialism and glorify exploitation. To understand
the class struggle that took place in the USSR, it is necessary to try to
have a more realistic image of the Russian kulak.
At the end of the nineteenth century, a specialist on Russian peasant life
wrote as follows:
`Every village commune has always three or four regular kulaks, as also
some half dozen smaller fry of the same kidney .... They want
neither skill nor industry; only promptitude to turn to their own
profit the needs, the sorrows, the sufferings and the misfortunes of
others.
`The distinctive characteristic of this class ... is the hard,
unflinching cruelty of a thoroughly educated man who has made his way
from poverty to wealth, and has come to consider money-making, by
whatever means, as the only pursuit to which a rational being should
devote himself.'
.
Stepniak,
quoted in Webb,
op. cit.
, pp. 563--564.
And É. J. Dillon,
from the U.S., who had a profound knowledge of
old Russia, wrote:
`And of all the human monsters I have ever met in my travels, I
cannot recall so malignant and odious as the Russian kulak.'
.
Dillon,
quoted in Webb,
op. cit.
, p. 565.
Fri Aug 25 09:03:42 PDT 1995